Triad 1 of 32 · 2026-09-24 · Difficulty 3 · Shared form or method, Conflict, Oblique/structural

The thread

Three books built out of other books that say so, and that disagree about what the store of already-said language does to the person copying it. For Burton the compiled cento is medicine (‘I write of melancholy, by being busy to avoid melancholy’); for Flaubert encyclopedic copying is the disease, ending in two clerks at the desk and a Dictionary of Accepted Ideas; for Mullen the dictionary and the thesaurus are partners in bed, and Flaubert’s stock phrase comes back emptied in ‘Elliptical’.

The three books

Notebook

  1. Omne meum, nihil meum: write a page made only of lines from your own commonplace notebooks, then the one ‘symptomatic dictionary’ entry (Mullen) that page is a symptom of. Where does the method stop being yours?
  2. Write ten Flaubert-style entries for the received ideas of theory (ARCHIVE:, RHIZOME:, THE OTHER:, LABYRINTH:, GESTURE:), then empty them in the manner of Mullen’s ‘Elliptical’. Which lasts longer, the stock opinion or the stock syntax?
  3. Heinsius’s ‘very lap of eternity’ vs. the clerks who ‘wanted to know the exact number of volumes’: describe a third posture toward a library as a single gesture.

Rabbit holes

Links as checked on the day of the reading.

To carry

“Omne meum, nihil meum, ’tis all mine, and none mine.” — Robert Burton, The Anatomy of Melancholy, ‘Democritus Junior to the Reader’

Themes

alphabetical order · cento · cliché · commonplace · compilation · copying · dictionary · encyclopedia · melancholy of scholars · received ideas


Previous: —
Next: The Two Clocks Problem